Missing TLOs, IDMs or RDLs from the surveys? Add more here!

  • Ian Cornwell

    December 22, 2020 at 10:20 am

    I attach an entry on the UN/CEFACT Core Components Technical Specification, not because I believe it would be a good choice as the single top level ontology, but because its key ideas have been found useful in bottom-up ontology development as described in ISO TR 25100:2012, and I’d like to make the ontology development community aware of that.

    OMG’s MOF is mentioned in the text but not included as a survey item – does anyone know any particular reason?

    And given the inclusion of generic metamodels, was there any consideration on ISO/IEC 11179 and related standards?

    Ontology Assessment Criteria – CCTS.xlsx

  • Matthew West

    December 22, 2020 at 11:05 am

    Noted. We’ve added this to our list to investigate in the New Year for extending the Top Level Ontologies, and/or Industry Data Models.

Log in to reply.

Stay Connected

Stay up to date on the latest news and events in the DT Hub Community

Terms agreement(Required)