-
I attach an entry on the UN/CEFACT Core Components Technical Specification, not because I believe it would be a good choice as the single top level ontology, but because its key ideas have been found useful in bottom-up ontology development as described in ISO TR 25100:2012, and I’d like to make the ontology development community aware of that.
OMG’s MOF is mentioned in the text but not included as a survey item – does anyone know any particular reason?
And given the inclusion of generic metamodels, was there any consideration on ISO/IEC 11179Â and related standards?