[Rachel Judson]

On 17/03/2022 at 09:19, Sven van den Berghe said:

According to the CReDo Technical Report 1 the CReDo source codes “are published under a permissive open-source licence and are held under version control at the Science & Technology Facilities Council (https://gitlab.stfc.ac.uk/credo/base-repo/).”, but the STFC GitLab requires an account to login.

How can I access the code?

 

Hi Sven

The project source code will be available as part of the CReDo legacy from the 28/03. We will be publishing new pages here on the DT Hub with all the details you will need about how to access on the 28/03. I’ll send you  link once it’s all up.

Thank you for your patience.

Rachel

[Rachel Judson]

So it seems the Environment Agency built the https://check-long-term-flood-risk.service.gov.uk/map which shows that section of the riverbank as being free from flooding. Would raising a FOI on the Environment agency to explain why that section of the bank does not flood according to their map? 

I found a report by WSP Parsons Brinckerhoff relating to the flood risk in Barking Riverside: Appendix D.pdf (lucmaps.co.uk) which may help?

 

[Rachel Judson]

It would be interesting to know the source of the data, John. What we have found through the work on Credo is that the data is not always easy to find, or consistent, so very much depends on data being supplied in a timely and usable way. It looks to me that some data is missing here either hydrology or some sensor data about particular flood defenses. 

The quality of the data is always key to getting quality results. 

[Rachel Judson]

Hi Humanner

I am not a housing or planning expert, so this is a bit speculative;

1. Large pieces of land are put up for sale by farmers and councils for housing developments as one large lot
2. Large parcels of land need huge investment so mostly taken up by big housing construction companies that have a portfolio of house designs for the site. 

What Jack along with 3D Repo and Bryden Wood are proposing, above, will give individuals better access to the planning process alongside the bigger actors, to take advantage of smaller available sites to develop houses of their own design. 

As to whether the UK have the creativity and nice designs available, I suppose you’ll have to ask Kevin McLeod on Grand Designs.

[Rachel Judson]

This table has been updated in the online version of the Survey of Top-Level Ontologies.

[Rachel Judson]

Hi @Gary, there isn’t one planned as yet, but it is possible that one may be set up once there is more information flowing here. 

[Rachel Judson]

Well If I can say, the Pathway document intends to do just that.  If anyone hasn’t read it, it is here and a fair amount of commentary about it was raised in the soon to be released Responses to the IMF Pathway consultation too. We will be looking at updating the Pathways document in the coming months to reflect the work done, the feedback received and our refocused approach.

This past year has seen the technical team focusing on developing an FDM (Foundation Data Model) Seed for the (Construction Innovation Hub) CIH’s Platform Design Programme and many of the output from that will inform the development of the top down approach detailed in the Pathway. (This is where the surveys of Top-level Ontologies, Industry Data Models and more have been developed)

But Commons have also been working with Accelerator Groups  to begin investigation into the bottom up approach. In keeping with Section 4.2 Tasks 2 and 4 of the Pathway, we are keen to build a Corpus of organisations with Digital Twins to develop demonstrators. If asset owners with Digital Twins are looking to explore the bottom up approach we would LOVE to hear from them.

[Rachel Judson]

The Benefits webinar happened last week on Tuesday 20 October and we were delighted to have nearly 100 people join us for the discussion. If you missed the webinar, it was recorded and is available now on YouTube

 

[Rachel Judson]

Hi Steven, Thank you for bringing this to my attention. The link has been updated and should be working now.

[Rachel Judson]

Thanks Steven. The full list will be available as part of the TLO Survey paper that we hope to publish toward the end of this month. It will be shared here at that time.

[Rachel Judson]

Thanks Kevin, I really enjoyed the presentation, and covered a lot of the ground that we have been talking about in the Commons.  I hope that yourself, or Costain as an organiastion, will respond to the IMF Pathway consultation before the end of August. ☺️

[Rachel Judson]

1 minute ago, AquamatiX said:

When is return date for INF feedback?

The Consultation for the IMF Pathway Closes on the 31 August 2020. You can access it here: 

https://www.cdbb.cam.ac.uk/news/pathway-towards-IMF

 

 

[Rachel Judson]

Thanks Dan, you make an interesting point. I will take this up with the IMF Pathway team and come back to you. Thanks

[Rachel Judson]

The technical report is published alongside a high-level summary, The approach to delivering a National Digital Twin for the United Kingdom, detailing the NDT programme’s approach to leading a cultural shift to reduce the technological, commercial and cultural barriers that prevent effective data sharing. It should be read alongside the Pathway document. 

The Approach is also available on the CDBB website: https://www.cdbb.cam.ac.uk/news/approach-delivery-national-digital-twin-united-kingdom

[Rachel Judson]

Hello Ian

I would also be interested in seeing what you have been working on. My username on Protégé is Rachel Judson.

Thank you

R