Homepage › Forums › General Discussion › Towards a Web of Digital Twins discussion › Reply To: Towards a Web of Digital Twins discussion
-
4 minutes ago, Guest Luke O’Rafferty said:
This is bearing in mind that Uniclass2015 is 5 years in and still “dynamic”, so even if you had used that to name everything in your power plant 6 months ago, comparable components might not match mine today.Â
Hi Luke. While Uniclass has been dynamic recent changes have typically expanded the classes (i.e. added new sub-codes) as opposed to altering its structure and taxonomy. In addition, Uniclass has been considered as part of a CIH, BEIS, CDBB, UKBIMA BIM interoperability report:https://www.cdbb.cam.ac.uk/news/bim-interoperability-expert-group-report
The report is currently out for public consultation, feel free to submit your views on its recommendations around Uniclass and other areas of interoperability.