Jump to content

Conceptual Modelling Language and Cultural Heritage Abstract Reference Model


RachelJudson
 Share

General

  • Ontologically Committed

    Ontological
  • Commitment Level

    Low
  • Subject

    Foundational
  • Categorical

    Yes

Vertical

  • Parent-arity Type Instance

    Unconstrained
  • Transitivity

    Yes
  • Boundedness Type Instance - Downward

    Bounded
  • Boundedness Type Instance - Fixed Finite Levels

    Fixed
  • Boundedness Type Instance - Number of Fixed Levels

    2
  • Stratification Type Instance

    Stratified
  • Formal Generation - Whole Part - Fusion

    No
  • Formal Generation - Whole Part - Complement

    No
  • Formal Generation - Type Instance - Fusion

    No
  • Formal Generation - Super Sub Type - Fusion

    No
  • Formal Generation - Super Sub Type - Complement

    No
  • Relation Class-ness Type Instance

    Second-class
  • Relation Class-ness Super Sub Type

    Second-class

Horizontal

  • Spacetime

    Separating
  • Locations

    Separating
  • Properties

    Separating
  • Endurants

    Unifying
  • Immaterial

    Separating

Universal

  • Time

    Eternalist
  • Indexicals: Here And Now

    Not-supported

F.6 ConML + CHARM – Conceptual Modelling Language and Cultural Heritage Abstract Reference Model

F.6.1 Overview

ConML is a conceptual modelling language that has been constructed from scratch with three major goals in mind:

  • Ease of use for non-experts in information technologies.
  • Simplicity.
  • Expressiveness in complex domains, such as those in the humanities
  • Capturing “soft” issues such as temporality, subjectivity and vagueness.

CHARM is a cultural heritage abstract reference model that extends ConML.

From http://www.conml.org/ and http://www.charminfo.org/.

See also: http://www.conml.org/Resources/ TechSpec.aspx

F.6.2 Top-level

image.png

image.png

F.6.3 Key characteristics

ConML(+CHARM) is a lightweight foundational ontology. It has few foundational ontological commitments. The combined ontology is focussed on its domain.

Return to top

Return to Appendix : Candidate source top-level ontologies – longlist

Return to Contents

Continue to Appendix G: Prior ontological commitment literature

 Share


User Feedback

Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.


Top
×
×
  • Create New...