[Holger Kessler]

BGS and Cambridge collaborated on modelling heat flow from basements to the surrounding strata and groundwater

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0886779818309635, http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/526141/

BGS and Dr Sauer Group worked on an integrated geospatial model at Farringdon Station

https://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/doi/abs/10.1680/cpid.61293.431

 

[Holger Kessler]

most interested in the governance and would love to connect on this after

[Holger Kessler]

2 minutes ago, Dan Clarke said:

Hi Holgerkessler,

Yes we would like to map the sub surface but haven’t progressed it yet. Having seen talks about work in this area i understand that governance can be an issue and welcome a conversation.

yes please – I can put you in touch with the Regional Geologist at the British Geological Survey – message me on holger.kessler @ cabinetoffice.gov.uk

[Holger Kessler]

Just now, Tom Hughes said:

@Dan, the importance of governance is prominent in your talk. From the Gemini principles, to the new governance you highlight in your digital strategy, and the risk that insufficient governance can pose to smart city projects. Are there any key resources you have used to shape your governance model?

 

could we see a slide on your governance model?

 

[Holger Kessler]

And finally it is vital that you keep the CPNI and NCSC involved as there are clear risks to our national and cyber infrastructure that need to be mitigated

 

[Holger Kessler]

And I would like to compare some notes on your learnings regarding the governance Dan, perhaps we could catch up some time – the National Underground Asset Register has taught us many lessons which match yours…

[Holger Kessler]

Hi, its a repeat story from me – have you thought about taking the subsurface into consideration? A significant amount of the urban infrastructure interacts with it…

[Holger Kessler]

On 01/05/2020 at 17:25, Mark Enzer said:

I thought that this was interesting on categorisation: https://iot-analytics.com/how-the-worlds-250-digital-twins-compare/

Very interesting @Heath @hugh 

[Holger Kessler]

@Hugh @Heath @Neil this is worth taking a look at

[Holger Kessler]

19 minutes ago, Guest Yu(Steven) ZHANG said:

Hi Neil.

It is good to listen to your presentation, and get to know a plan for ‘Information Management Framework Pathway’ paper. As a visitor (non-member), I can see 10 terms- common languages for people.

Meanwhile, I am also interested in the common languages for data. I’d love to hear your comments on the following 2 examples of data and meta data, particularly with relation to the Common Steam at DT hub- the foundation data model. 

1. Use common terms within Data, Metadata and supporting information ( Energy Data Task Force)

https://modernisingenergydata.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/MED/pages/319389709/Data+Best+Practice+v0.21#2.-Use-common-terms-within-Data%2C-Metadata-and-supporting-information

“There are currently efforts to standardise the naming conventions used across a range of infrastructure domains by the Digital Framework Task Group as part of the National Digital Twin programme of work. The long term goal is to define an ontology which enables different sectors to use a common language which in turn enables effective cross sector data sharing.

In the near term, it is unhelpful to create yet another glossary so we propose a two staged approach.”

2. DAFNI-

as mentioned by Brian Matthews two weeks ago, and also mentioned in DAFNI’s news letter-“Transition to new metadata schema for the data store, adhering to standards which comply with the DCAT v2 vocabulary. ” 

https://www.dafni.ac.uk/news/dafni-newsletter-may-2020/

 

Steven

there is also a Water Data Task Force and an emerging Telco Data Task Force that should be aligned

 

[Holger Kessler]

and it is even more philosophical as the built environment interdigitates, interacts and in many cases shapes and forms the natural environment – this is all part of the wider discussion about the #anthropocene

[Holger Kessler]

i know its hard – here some thinking donwe by planners and geologists

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/BIM-CIM-and-GeoCIM-relationships-by-geographical-scale-of-interest-x-axis-and-data_fig3_337740565

 

[Holger Kessler]

3 minutes ago, Nicholas said:

Hi @holgerkessler and @Neil

A further thought is that this is a benefit of making this Glossary online/dynamic – it is easier to update as more thinking emerges including from other areas and industries

I totally agree that a dynamic online approach is right!

[Holger Kessler]

Just now, Neil Thomspon said:

1 minute ago, Neil Thomspon said:

Some of the Geospatial Commission’s partner bodies (eg the BGS) have large controlled vocabularies – not all relevant of course – i feel the DTHub need to work really hard to break out of the civil engineering silos and bring in others – who at the moment struggle to see their role in here or don’t even know CDBB exists….

the name “Built Britain” doesn’t help….

 

 

[Holger Kessler]

Hi how do you propose to link with the many existing catalogues/vocabularies/dictionaries that already exist?