-
Hi Tom.
Regarding the pilot locations, it’s correct that a key reason was the ability to build on existing work, but the differences between the areas held great appeal as you say. Not only were we able to see differences between dense urban networks and sparser suburban and rural locations, but there were also real differences (and some similarities) between how data is represented in the two areas. These differences allowed us to build our understanding of how to visualise and interact with data in different locations, but also an understanding of the flexibility that we would need to provide for such a wide range of asset owners.