Homepage › Forums › General Discussion › Twinfrastructure discussion › Reply To: Twinfrastructure discussion
-
1 minute ago, DRossiter87 said:
Hi @Michael Mulquin. People are more than welcome to suggest terms and definitions that have been used elsewhere such as those within the ISO online browsing platform and IEC electropedia. However, these terms need to be carefully considered to ensure that they are fit for purpose for the DT Hub community.
Exactly, and that is the point I was making. Many definitions in these glossaries were developed for specific purposes and we found were not necessarily relevant to smart cities. But it was an important starting place for us, and it meant that we needed to consider why we needed to reject the existing definitions before starting work on developing our own. We found that, even where existing definitions were not suitable, there was often some useful ideas that we could take forward in developing our own one.