Homepage › Forums › General Discussion › Twinfrastructure discussion › Reply To: Twinfrastructure discussion
-
3 minutes ago, Michael Mulquin said:
I know it is an adjacent subject, but in our IEC Smart Cities Terminology Working Group, when developing definitions for terms, we initially searched through the IEC, ISO and ITU glossaries and captured whatever relevant definitions we could find there. Our preference was then to take an existing definition, if it was suitable, as this would help consistency with other standards work. If no existing definitions were quite right, the next stage would be to see if there was an existing definition which could be made appropriate by adding an explanatory note. Only when we couldn’t do any of these did we develop a new definition.
Hi @Michael Mulquin. People are more than welcome to suggest terms and definitions that have been used elsewhere such as those within the ISO online browsing platform and IEC electropedia. However, these terms need to be carefully considered to ensure that they are fit for purpose for the DT Hub community.