-
How to Balancing Human Insight with Test Automation?
Test automation has become a backbone of modern software delivery, helping teams reduce repetitive work, accelerate releases, and catch regressions early. But one challenge I see often is figuring out the right balance between automated tests and manual, exploratory testing. Automated tests are great for repeated regression checks across builds, Validating APIs, integrations, and UI flows at scale, Maintaining speed in CI/CD pipelines. However, they can’t always catch subtle issues like usability problems, accessibility gaps, or unexpected user behavior. That’s where human testers still play a critical role.
Some strategies I’ve seen teams adopt include Automating high-value, stable scenarios (e.g., login, payment processing) while leaving complex edge cases for exploratory testing, Using automation to free testers’ time so they can focus on creative test design, Combining unit, integration, and end-to-end automation for layered coverage. Interestingly, a few newer approaches are making test automation more accessible — tools that generate tests automatically from production traffic or from API contracts, reducing the upfront scripting effort. These kinds of innovations could help teams achieve better coverage without burning time writing repetitive scripts. How does your team decide what to automate vs. what to test manually? Have you found a sweet spot, or is it still a balancing act?
-
0 Replies
Sorry, there were no replies found.
Log in to reply.