A Survey of Top-level Ontologies - References

References 

Ainsworth, T. (2020). “Form vs. Matter.” In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/form-matter

Cameron, R. P. (2010). “How to have a radically minimal ontology.” Philosophical Studies, 151(2), 249–264. 
 

Casati, R. & Varzi, A. C. (1999). Parts and places: The structures of spatial representation. MIT Press. 
 

Galton, A. (2018). “The Treatment of Time in Upper Ontologies.” In FOIS (pp. 33–46). Retrieved from http://ebooks.iospress.nl/publication/50243 
 

Gilmore, C., Costa, D. & Calosi, C. (2016). “Relativity and three four-dimensionalisms.” Philosophy Compass, 11(2), 102–120. Retrieved from https://philpapers.org/rec/GILRAT-10
 

Hetherington, J. & West, M. (2020). “The pathway towards an Information Management Framework-A ‘Commons’ for Digital Built Britain.” 
 

ISO. (2019). “Information technology – Top-Level Ontologies (TLO) – Part1: Requirements.” 
 

Kant, I. (1964). Critique of pure reason (p. 483, 1 l.). London, New York, E. P. Dutton & Co.: J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd.; 
 

Locke, J. (1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (p. 867). Oxford: Clarendon Press. 
 

Lowe, E. J. (1998). The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 
 

Nash, L. K. (1963). “The nature of the natural sciences.” 
 

“OntoClean – Identity.” (n.d.). Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OntoClean#Identity
 

Partridge, C. (1996). Business objects: re-engineering for re-use. Butterworth-Heinemann. 
 

Partridge, C., de Cesare, S., Mitchell, A., Gailly, F. & Khan, M. (2017). “Developing an Ontological Sandbox: Investigating Multi-Level Modelling’s Possible Metaphysical Structures.” Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/35222673
 

Partridge, C., de Cesare, S., Mitchell, A., Leon, A., Gailly, F. & Khan, M. (2018). “Ontology then Agentology: A Finer Grained Framework for Enterprise Modelling.” In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD 2018) (pp. 454–463). Funchal, Madeira, Portugal: SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/35335427 
 

Partridge, C., de Cesare, S., Mitchell, A. & Odell, J. (2016). “Formalization of the classification pattern: survey of classification modeling in information systems engineering.” Software & Systems Modeling, 1–37. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10270-016-0521-5 
 

Partridge, C., Mitchell, A., Loneragan, M., Atkinson, H., de Cesare, S. & Khan, M. (2019). “Coordinate Systems: Level Ascending Ontological Options.” In 2019 ACM/IEEE 22nd International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C) (pp. 78–87). Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/40354620
 

Schaffer, J. (2010). “Monism: The priority of the whole.” Philosophical Review, 119(1), 31–76. 
 

Schaffer, J. (2015). “What not to multiply without necessity.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 93(4), 644–664. 
 

Sider, T. (2013). “Against parthood.” Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, 8(2013), 237–293. 
 

Strachey, C. (2000). “Fundamental concepts in programming languages.” Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation, 13(1-2), 11–49. 
 

Varzi, A. (2019). “Mereology.” In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mereology
 

Yagisawa, T. (2005). “Possible Objects.” In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/possible-objects/