General
-
Ontologically Committed
Ontological -
Commitment Level
Low -
Subject
Foundational -
Categorical
Yes
Vertical
-
Parent-arity Type Instance
Unconstrained -
Transitivity
Yes -
Boundedness Type Instance - Downward
Bounded -
Boundedness Type Instance - Fixed Finite Levels
Fixed -
Boundedness Type Instance - Number of Fixed Levels
2 -
Stratification Type Instance
Stratified -
Formal Generation - Whole Part - Fusion
No -
Formal Generation - Whole Part - Complement
No -
Formal Generation - Type Instance - Fusion
No -
Formal Generation - Super Sub Type - Fusion
No -
Formal Generation - Super Sub Type - Complement
No -
Relation Class-ness Type Instance
Second-class -
Relation Class-ness Super Sub Type
Second-class
Horizontal
- No data to show
Universal
-
Indexicals: Here And Now
Not-supported
F. 24 MarineTLO: A Top-Level Ontology for the Marine Domain
F24.1 Overview
Is a top-level ontology, generic enough to provide consistent abstractions or specifications of concepts included in all data models or ontologies of marine data sources and provide the necessary properties to make this distributed knowledge base a coherent source of facts relating observational data with the respective spatiotemporal context and categorical (systematic) domain knowledge.
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_ontology#MarineTLO.
See also: https://projects.ics.forth.gr/isl/MarineTLO/
F.24.2 Top-level
The model is formulated as an object-oriented semantic model, hence it has meta-class and class levels, as shown below.
The first broad division into persistent items and temporal phenomenon, looks similar to the endurantist’s continuant and occurrent distinction.
F.24.3 Key characteristics
Appears to have a lightweight top-level – with few ontological commitments.
Possibly an endurantist commitment.
F.24.4. Excerpts
“Formulation – It is an object-oriented semantic model, expressed to a form comprehensible to both documentation experts and information scientists while readily can be converted to machine-readable formats such as RDF Schema, OWL, etc”
Return to Appendix : Candidate source top-level ontologies – longlist
Continue to Appendix G: Prior ontological commitment literature
Recommended Comments
There are no comments to display.