Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'Building Information Modelling (BIM)'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Themes

  • Member Forums
    • General discussion
    • Testing digital twin concepts
    • Digital twin competencies
    • Pathway to value
    • IMF Pathway
    • Videos
  • IMF Community's Forum
  • DT Toolkit's Case studies
  • DT Toolkit's Business case
  • DT Toolkit's Use cases
  • DT Toolkit's Roadmap
  • DT Toolkit's Network feedback
  • Data Value and Quality's Forum

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Found 10 results

  1. Vicki Reynolds

    Golden Thread Survey Responses

    Hi all, attached is the full set of survey responses from the Golden Thread Survey carried out by i3PT and the CIOB. There are some interesting responses to the questions about digital tools and capability. We’re only distributing this one to interested parties rather than marketing it more widely. That being said, it is in no way restricted, so please feel free to share with anyone that you think may be interested. I’ve also included the original summary report. Thanks COP1060 - Golden Thread - Complete Survey Res.pdf Golden-Thread-Review.pdf
  2. Hi guys, so my first post and an opening for discussion. Should the production of the digital twin be tied strictly to the physical construction? My reasoning for bringing this up is that all too often digital assets are left hanging and incomplete at the end of a project during handover, for a digital twin to be truly effective it needs to be commissioned just like the physical asset with remediation planned in, well into the operational phase. All too often the model authors and those intimate with the data have moved onto other projects with updates and changes being difficult to imple
  3. David McK

    The value of, and from, Data

    For me, Digital Twins are for acquiring, maintaining and exploiting Data - as a means to an end. We need to shift the typical focus of many organisations away from technology and "IT" towards understanding this perspective. I think the real value comes from thinking about Data Flows and not just the Data (store / Lake / whatever). This is my perspective also in the context of Asset Management. I am not associated with Anmut, but I recommend this well-written Report. (They have collaborated with Highways England to do some extremely exciting and useful work re Gemini.) https://anmut.
  4. Morning All, Currently investigating a case for a Digital Twin concept - is there any guidance relating to the structure of the data to align up to a more national structure? Any useful guidance to help the beginnings of this case move in the right direction? Thanks, Lewis
  5. I recently posed a question in this forum to clarify thoughts on the need for a digital twin ‘test’... a way of determining if a proposed digital twin is actually what everyone can agree upon and that matches expectations. A test will serve as an invaluable tool for educating and up-skilling, avoidingconfusion and set a direction for implementation. This is something particularly close to my heart as we’re currently (still) experiencing this in global BIM discussions. Whilst on the topic of BIM, the test could be a great way of identifying what a typical BIM process deliverable is and h
  6. BIM Twin What is What if Files Queries Physical Real Asset Function Time stamp Time graph Transaction Enterprise Outputs Outcomes As Designed? As Intended? (for discussion) I wanted to s
  7. Dear DT Hub Community Does it feel like getting started on a Digital Twin journey is too hard? Firstly I agree with you and believe that it won't stay this way for long (believe.. he says!). After several years working in UK infra, I now see more of the "realities" of digital twins.... I've worked as the buyer, seller, and builder of digital twins. I am trailing this theory with a major UK Infrastructure Operator (early stages), however, I would really like to determine the interest of this group because I want to draft up a proposal/action plan. To give you an idea th
  8. KReevesDigi

    Twin Tools

    Hello Everybody !! First topic on the lovely new Twin Hub and good to see fellow enthusiasts get engaged. I would be interested to know the types of tools people are using within their Digital Twin journeys and for what purpose, this is important as getting vendors included and supporting the IMF will be crucial success at scale. A few tools we are using in Costain to get the discussion moving (non-exhaustive, only scratching the surface!) : ArchiMate - We use this as the starting point aligned to the TOGAF architectural framework. This is really key as it starts with busin
  9. DRossiter87

    BIM Interoperability Report

    Hi all, Today CDBB released their BIM interoperability report. While BIM is distinct from Digital Twins there will be a need to interoperate between them. As such, I think this report will be of use to members. The report is currently out for public consultation. Available at the link provided and attached below ☺️ https://www.cdbb.cam.ac.uk/news/bim-interoperability-expert-group-report cih_bim_interoperability_expert_group_report_april_2020_final.pdf
  10. A new Construction Innovation Hub research programme explores procurement strategies to incentivise collaborative delivery and optimise whole-life outcomes. Lead author of the review, Professor David Mosey from King’s College London Centre of Construction Law, considers the current procurement landscape and the benefits of... View the full article
Top
×
×
  • Create New...