Jump to content
Beyond buzzwords: digital twin maturity spectrum

Beyond buzzwords: digital twin maturity spectrum

Simon Evans

Tammy Au
Message added by Tammy Au,

Please be aware that these comments were copied here from another source and that the date and time shown for each comment may not be accurate.

In my first article, I explored the basic concept of digital twins. Fundamentally, they are a digital replica of a physical thing - a ‘twin’. But depending on maturity, this replica can range from a simple representation of a local component, all the way to a fully integrated and highly accurate model of an entire asset, facility or even a country, with each component dynamically linked to engineering, construction, and operational data.

This broad range of what a digital twin can be has made defining and understanding them extremely difficult, with disagreement on what level of maturity or features constitute a ‘true’ digital twin. Inflated market expectations, promising more than is currently achievable, have further complicated things.

In this second article (attachment below), I put forward a maturity spectrum in an attempt to offer more clarity and understanding. Undoubtedly there will be critics, but it has been tested extensively cross-industry and seems to offer a clear framework for simply articulating what a digital twin is at each element of maturity.

I welcome feedback as industry continue working to create a common definition.


  • Like 1

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

  • Create New...